Investing Research Paper

Investing Research PaperIt is recommended that you research the investment companies you want to invest in before purchasing research paper. There are many options for you, however, it is essential that you know who you are going to be buying from. It is best if you know their background, and what they offer. This will help you in making an informed decision and can save you time and energy in your search.The best place to find a reputable financial organization is with the Better Business Bureau. If you know someone who has purchased research paper from these firms, you can ask them if they have received a satisfactory service. This will give you a good idea of their professionalism and commitment to providing a good service. You can check the Better Business Bureau website for this information. Many firms also offer testimonials, so you can check out their website.Once you have found a reputable firm to purchase research paper from, you should make sure that you do your research. T here are a number of websites that offer reviews of investment companies. You can choose the firm that offers the service you want to buy from, and then read the reviews that are posted on these sites. You will be able to identify the firms that offer good services, while checking out the ones that are not.It is important that you do your research when you purchase research paper. You should compare the prices that these firms charge you with the amount that you can expect to earn with the service. You will need to get a good idea of what type of research paper will work best for you. If you do not have a lot of time to spend on researching the companies you want to invest in, you can always hire a research consulting firm to do the research for you.Research consulting firms are usually a good choice for individuals that want to buy research paper on a monthly basis. These firms are often called brokers, but the majority of them are actually professional investors. They take the res earch that you need and arrange for it to be delivered to you monthly, in which you can analyze the firm's performance and make your own decisions about the company.A research consulting firm is often less expensive than buying research paper directly. For example, they might charge you per issue or per file. These firms charge less because they are not making any deals with companies or investing in them, but their fees are paid by the clients.When you have selected a research consulting firm for purchasing research paper, you will have to get the client to agree to pay these fees. They will then use the fees to pay for the research papers. A good research consulting firm will offer you a choice of how much they will charge you per issue, and this will help you to find the firm that will be the most beneficial for you.

Did Volcanoes Kill the Dinosaurs

Sixty-five million years ago, give or take a few hundred thousand years, a meteor smashed into Mexicos Yucatan Peninsula, throwing up billowing clouds of ash and smoke that quickly spread, over the next few days and weeks, across the worlds atmosphere. Blotted out, the sun could no longer nourish the earths teeming ferns, forests, and flowers, and as these plants died, so did the animals that fed on them — first the herbivorous dinosaurs, and then the carnivorous dinosaurs whose populations these plant-eaters sustained. That, in a nutshell (or a meteor crater), is the story of the K/T Extinction Event. But some experts think this story is incomplete: it has a suitably thrilling climax, to be sure, but not enough attention has been paid to the events leading up to it. Specifically, evidence exists that the five million years leading up to the K/T Extinction witnessed a huge surge in volcanic activity — and that lung-choking, sun-blocking volcanic ash, every bit as much as meteor debris, may have weakened dinosaurs to such an extent that they were easy pickings for the Yucatan disaster. The Volcanoes of the Late Cretaceous Period Throughout its history, the earth has been geologically active — and during the late Cretaceous period, 70 million years ago, the most geologically active place on earth was northern India, near modern-day Mumbai. (This had nothing to do with the slow collision of India with the underside of Eurasia, which wouldnt occur for another ten million years, but stresses in  the fast-moving subcontinental plate were certainly involved.) Specifically, the volcanoes of the Deccan Traps spewed lava for tens of thousands of years on end; this lava eventually covered over 200,000 square miles of the subcontinent and reached a depth (in some locations) of over a mile! As you can imagine, the Deccan Traps were bad news for local Indian and Asian wildlife, as terrestrial and marine animals were literally cooked alive and then buried beneath millions of tons of solidifying lava. But the traps may also have had a disastrous effect on the worldwide ecology since volcanoes are notorious for releasing high levels of sulfur and carbon dioxide —  which would have both acidified the worlds oceans and caused a rapid spate of global warming, even despite all the accompanying dust thrown up into atmosphere. (Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, meaning it tends reflects heat from the earth back onto the surface, rather than allowing it to dissipate into outer space.) Volcano Extinction vs. Meteor Extinction What makes the volcano scenario hard to prove or disprove, vis-a-vis the meteor impact theory of dinosaur extinction, is that it depends on much of the same evidence. One key piece of data adduced by supporters of the Yucatan meteor impact is the characteristic layer of iridium, an element common in asteroids, in sediments laid down at the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary. Unfortunately, iridium is also found in the molten rock under the earths crust, which  can be  expelled by volcanoes! The same applies to shocked-quartz crystals, which can be caused by either meteor impacts or (at least according to some theories) intense volcanic eruptions. What about the dinosaurs themselves, and their persistence — or lack of it — in the fossil record? We know that dinosaurs roamed the earth right up until the K/T boundary, 65 million years ago, whereas the Deccan Traps became active 70 million years ago. Thats a very soft boundary extinction of five million years, while its clear that dinosaurs went extinct within a couple of hundred thousand years of the Yucatan meteor impact — a relatively hard boundary extinction by geological standards. (On the other hand, there is some evidence that dinosaurs were dwindling in diversity during the last few million years of the Cretaceous period, which may or may not be attributable to volcanic activity.) In the end, these two scenarios — death by volcano and death by meteor — are not inconsistent with one another. It may very well be the case that all terrestrial life on earth, including dinosaurs, was profoundly weakened by the Deccan Traps, and the Yucatan meteor delivered the proverbial coup de grace. In effect, a slow, painful extinction was followed by a fast, even more painful extinction (which brings to mind that old saying about how people go bankrupt: a little bit at a time, and then all at once.) Volcanoes May Not Have Killed the Dinosaurs - But They Made Dinosaurs Possible Ironically, we do know one instance in which volcanoes had a major impact on dinosaurs — but it happened at the end of the Triassic period, not the Cretaceous. A new study makes the solid case that the end-Triassic extinction event, which doomed more than half of all terrestrial animals, was caused by volcanic eruptions accompanying the breakup of the supercontinent Pangaea. It was only after the dust had cleared that the earliest dinosaurs — which evolved during the middle Triassic period--were free to fill the open ecological niches left by their doomed relatives, and assert their dominance during the ensuing Jurassic and Cretaceous periods.

12 Angry Men-Social Psych Review - 1437 Words

One Belligerent Room There are few examples of group dynamics as complete and realistic as the film Twelve Angry Men. Recently I was required to view this film and had at first great reservations about its value as an educational tool, but soon after the opening credits rolled by and the deliberations began to take place I was caught up in the story. This film was not only entertaining, but it also serves as a great example of many of the theories and aspects of social psychology. Including too many concepts to name, the film touched on several very important theories: process loss in group decisions, groupthink, the fatal attribution error (FAE), normative social influence, and social norms. One of the first concepts to be seen in†¦show more content†¦Even if the evidence does not necessarily add up the man is still a liar and his type does not deserve to be free. Only a few jurors fight this error of judgment and remind the others that his rough upbringing may have had something to do with his past convictions and that this situation did not necessarily warrant violence toward his father. Another aspect of social psychology that is demonstrated by the characters in the film is that of social roles and the need to follow them. Social norms are rules that explain how persons are expected to behave in certain situations; if a social norm is rebelled against the results are often extreme. This is seen incredibly easily in how well the words of the jurors mirror the actions of participants in a 1951 study by Schacter. In the psychological study on norm breaking, a confederate consistently went against the group in a discussion on the possible sentencing of an imaginary juvenile delinquent. The group first tried to bring the deviant back to the group norm and after no success proceeded to ignore and then punish him for his dissenting belief. The very same things happen to the characters who fail to conform to the norm; when Mr. Davis is the lone d issenter one of the other jurors asks that he tell the group where he was mixed up so they could try to straighten (him) out. Another example of this same sort of behavior occurs when one of the last three jurors standing for conviction begins speaking passionatelyShow MoreRelatedâ€Å"Vulgarized Filipino Identity: Development of Filipino Profanity†5036 Words   |  21 PagesSchool of Languages, Humanities and Social Sciences Mapà ºa Institute of Technology A Research Draft on â€Å"Vulgarized Filipino Identity: Development of Filipino Profanity† Introduction Vulgarity of Language Humans express their feelings in many different ways physically, mentally or verbally. Vulgar words, also known as swearing or cursing exists in all human languages that perform certain functions. One study found that swearing is not merely a common reaction to pain; it actually functionsRead MoreBehaviorism and Classical Conditioning Essay3350 Words   |  14 Pages Watson, there have been many variations of the behaviorist view that have surfaced over the years. In this paper I will attempt to give a detailed description of the history of behaviorism including information about some of the most influential men associated with this movement. I will also explain the methodologies associated with behaviorism such as classical conditioning, operant conditioning, and other controversial theories and views. Behaviorism The atmosphere surrounding the psychologicalRead MoreNeo Personality Inventory Revised ( Neo Pi R )4227 Words   |  17 Pages NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO PI-R) Linda Laiton Dominguez Salem College Psych 220, Spring 2017 Dr. Mary Jacobsen April 18, 2017 Psychological tests or psychological assessments are an important asset in the field of psychology. These tests are designed toRead MoreUse Of Traditional Chinese Medicine During The Treatment Of Schizophrenia Essay7976 Words   |  32 Pagesto be one of the top ten causes of long-term disability worldwide. Late adolescence and early adulthood are periods for the onset of schizophrenia. In 40% of men and 23% of women diagnosed with schizophrenia, the condition manifested before the age of 19 (Addington, Cadenhead, Cannon, 2007).These are critical years in a young adult’s social and vocational development. The term schizophrenia was first used in 1908 by Eugen Bleuler, a Swiss psychiatrist, and was meant to describe the disunity ofRead MoreFundamentals of Hrm263904 Words   |  1056 PagesLise Johnson Sarah Vernon Amy Scholz Laura Finley Dorothy Sinclair Sandra Dumas Susan McLaughlin Kevin Murphy Laura Ierardi Allison Morris Hilary Newman mb editorial services David Levy  ©Michael Eudenbach/Getty Images, Inc. This book was set in 10/12 ITC Legacy Serif Book by Aptaracorp, Inc. and printed and bound by Courier/Kendallville. The cover was printed by Courier/Kendallville. This book is printed on acid free paper. Copyright  © 2010, 2007, 2005, 2002 John Wiley Sons, Inc. All rights reservedRead MoreLogical Reasoning189930 Words   |  760 Pages....................................................................................................... 5 Examples of Good Reasoning............................................................................................................. 14 Review of Major Points ....................................................................................................................... 17 Glossary .................................................................................................

Healthcare Environment in Oncology Care

Question: Discuss about the Healthcare Environment in Oncology Care. Answer: Introduction: The concept of safety in healthcare tends to differ from one individual patient to another (Ekwall, 2013).Safety is not only maintained by healthcare workers in their practices but patients also have become quite responsible to maintain their own safety irrespective of others safe practices. However, in case of the patients, the concept of safety is vivid and is not as simple as in case of the healthcare professionals. Different patients with different diseases and different experiences have developed their own concept of safety that they rely on and hence it becomes extremely difficult for healthcare professionals to understand the different perspectives of safety of different individuals (Browall et al., 2013). This is extremely important to be known by healthcare staffs in the healthcare system so that they can provide maximum patient satisfaction and maintain dignity and autonomy. This essay will look at the paper Rhodeset al., 2016 which covers the issue of relative concept of patients safety and its implications on nursing practices and healthcare. The capability of making a sense by an individual can be defined as the development of awareness of an individual about his/her surroundings. This is called sensemaking in Rhodes et al., 2016. It can be accepted as the cognitive information processing activity that also involves the emotional and embodied aspects of an individuals livings (Michtalik et al., 2013). It might occur on several occasions where a persons sense-making capability may make him/her believe a concept of safety that may vary with healthcare professionals and therefore it becomes important that healthcare staff develop ideas and knowledge about it. Setting a set of primary care parameters centers the main research question that they had set therefore is that how they develop a particular perception about how patients perceive their experiences in the primary healthcare settings. They have also set up the aim to develop an understanding of the sense-making capability of the patients and how that shaped their idea and knowledge about safety. This will in turn help the searchers to resonate the findings of researchers like Doherty and Saunders to understand about how patients in hospitals undergo their sense making capabilities and also their concept of safety. This would ultimately help the healthcare professions to develop their knowledge about the patients needs and demands and will shape their services in a way that will provide best patient satisfaction(Doyle, Lennox Bell, 2013) The research design and the methods: The method that was selected by the researcher was a qualitative method where they elected 14 males and 24 females of varied backgrounds having different age, carer status, education level and socioeconomic and ethnic background so that a wide variety of data and conceptions of participants can be involved. Interviews were conducted in patients personal homes for about 30 minutes to two hours. No closed questions were asked and participants were requested to discuss their concept on the topic of safety. Answers were coded and transcribed. Separate categories were set after the transcripts were entered into NVivo10 (qualitative data software package; Brisbane, QS International) followed by thematic analysis and following grounded theory techniques the codes were extensively analyzed and at first sixty four codes were analyzed. From these codes seven themes were selected which were systems safety, communication safety, medical safety, timely access, flexibility in the interpretation of rules and holistic care and relationship continuity. From this part, the themes were further categorized into main three themes which include organizational and systems-level tensions constraining safety, trust and psycho-social aspects of professional-patient relationships and choice, continuity, access and the temporal underpinnings for safety. Reanalysis if the data had been conducted using the Weiks framework. This helped the researchers to understand the sense making around patient safety in primary care centre (Maitilis Christiansen, 2014). This method was the best in this case as it had included different types of patients of different gender age and social backgrounds and therefore had helped to involve a wide variety of ideas and perceptions into the research. As open end questions were asked, the patients were free to discuss their concept without any inhibition and as a result, clarity in their responses could be maintained (Ozok et al., 2014) Findings and relevance to contemporary nursing policy and practice: Patients conception of safety was very complex to understand as they clearly made it evident that it is not an apolitical conception being a unified objective but is a contestable, contingent, fluid and negotiable accomplishment. Patients were found to be more comfortable in discussing the concept through their experiences rather than defining them in definite words. Aspects of primary healthcare (like approachability) were considered as an important feature in conception of safety (Ozok et al., 2013). Researchers have stated this because a circumstantial situation which might be safe for one patient may be less safe for another and also with the practitioner. The healthcare systems should be more transparent as that will help them to gain more knowledge about a particular intervention such as why it is provided, what the benefits are and what the disadvantages are and as well as many others. This had led them to believe that they should take informal strategies to provide their own safety as they believe that the concept of safety defined by the policy makers and clinicians are never made clear to the patients (Soininen et al., 2013). Many patients gave importance to their own negative experiences of the past that makes them believe that they should be themselves proactive and cautious about their own safety. Their feeling of disempowerment and devaluing made them take action based on their anticipation and practiced their own safety. Moreover it was also seen that, unlike Dohertys (Doherty is the scientist on whose the paper was which we analysed was based) belief which suggested that patients should have entire trust on doctors who are taking the responsibility of caring for them, patients were mostly comfortable to allow their own judgments to speak up while interacting with their doctors about the interventions, and this was mainly due to negative experiences. Although patients were aware of the gap in medical knowledge they have, they were most likely to be concerned for their own safety rather than being completely relying on professionals. It was also found that lack of trust in doctors, fear of judgments by them an also presumptions about guidelines that constrain clinicians inhibit patients to sort for medical advice which in turn affects their safety (Allen, Braithwaite, Sandall, Waring, 2016). Such gap in interactions with the healthcare professionals may have negative consequence on their own health. Although the patient develops a sense of psychosocial safety for themselves but this cannot bring the best results. Often experienced patients may take decisions that might be harmful for them (Nygren et al., 2013). Therefore it is extremely important for the establishment of a transparent relationship between the patients and the healthcare professionals. Both the parties should be cooperating with each other providing proper and relevant information and clearing out differences which will help in developingan environment where the concept of safety will be constant for both of them (Mitchell et al., 2015) Conclusions: The article provides important information about patient ideas about safety. The paper is clear and concise. It concludes thatsensemaking capabilities of both the healthcare professional and patients lead them to develop different concepts of safety in healthcare. As a result patients concept of safety is different and this often may lead to chaotic situations when the healthcare staff fail to provide patient satisfaction. Hence it is important to overcome the issues with proper collaborative practices and informing patients to bridge the gap and maintain a transparent relationship. References: Allen, D., Braithwaite, J., Sandall, J., Waring, J. (2016).The sociology of healthcare safety and quality(1st ed.). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell. Browall, M., Koinberg, I., Falk, H., Wijk, H. (2013).Patients' experience of important factors in the healthcare environment in oncology care.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being,8. Doyle, C., Lennox, L., Bell, D. (2013). A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness.BMJ open,3(1), e001570. Ekwall, A. (2013). Acuity and anxiety from the patient's perspective in the emergency department.Journal of emergency nursing,39(6), 534-538. Maitlis, S., Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward.The Academy of Management Annals,8(1), 57-125. Michtalik, H. J., Yeh, H. C., Pronovost, P. J., Brotman, D. J. (2013). Impact of attending physician workload on patient care: a survey of hospitalists.JAMA internal medicine,173(5), 375-377. Mitchell, I., Schuster, A., Smith, K., Pronovost, P., Wu, A. (2015). Patient safety reporting: a qualitative study of thoughts and perceptions of experts 15 years after To Err is Human.BMJ QualSaf, bmjqs-2015. Nygren, M., Roback, K., hrn, A., Rutberg, H., Rahmqvist, M., Nilsen, P. (2013). Factors influencing patient safety in Sweden: perceptions of patient safety officers in the county councils.BMC health services research,13(1), 52. Ozok, A. A., Wu, H., Garrido, M., Pronovost, P. J., Gurses, A. P. (2014). Usability and perceived usefulness of personal health records for preventive health care: A case study focusing on patients' and primary care providers' perspectives.Applied ergonomics,45(3), 613-628. Rhodes, P., McDonald, R., Campbell, S., Daker?White, G., Sanders, C. (2016).Sensemaking and the co?production of safety: a qualitative study of primary medical care patients. Sociology of Health Illness, 38(2), 270-285. Soininen, P., Vlimki, M., Noda, T., Puukka, P., Korkeila, J., Joffe, G., Putkonen, H. (2013).Secluded and restrained patients' perceptions of their treatment.International journal of mental health nursing,22(1), 47-55.